Blab Crypto
Bank of England Governor Denies Nigel Farage Lobbying Influenced Digital Pound Policy
Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, has firmly denied that a September 2025 meeting with former UKIP leader Nigel Farage altered the central bank’s stance on a potential digital pound. In a written reply to Labour MP Joe Powell, Bailey emphasized that the Bank is “able to spot attempts to influence its policymaking” and that its work on the digital pound remains independent. He added, “Following our meeting, Mr Farage spoke with the press outlining that we had discussed a range of topics, including cryptocurrencies. I am happy to confirm that no policy changes have taken place as a result of interventions by Mr Farage.” The clarification comes amid mounting scrutiny of the Bank’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) research and the broader political context surrounding the project.
Farage has long been a vocal critic of CBDCs in the UK, arguing that a digital pound could facilitate financial surveillance and erode personal freedom. He has even stated that he would prefer imprisonment to living under such a system. The controversy intensified after reports surfaced that Farage accepted substantial gifts from individuals linked to the crypto industry, including a £5 million donation from a crypto billionaire. In July 2026, Farage resigned his parliamentary seat amid an investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards over undeclared gifts, yet he has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that he has not broken the law.
The Bank’s statement is significant because CBDC policy sits at the intersection of monetary infrastructure, privacy, payment innovation, and political trust. If the public perceives that central bank decisions are swayed by political pressure or crypto lobbying, confidence in the review process could erode before a final decision is made. By underscoring its independence, the Bank aims to protect the credibility of its CBDC review and keep the digital pound on a technical and policy footing rather than a political one.
At present, the Bank of England is still researching a potential digital pound. No decision has been taken on whether to introduce the currency, and the project remains in the design phase. A recent update from the Bank noted that any launch would require further analysis and public consultation, allowing policymakers time to address concerns about privacy, access, commercial bank deposits, financial stability, and the role of central bank money in retail payments.
In parallel with the digital pound research, the Bank has been testing how tokenised assets could be settled using central bank money. Earlier this year, it launched a six‑month pilot involving 18 companies as part of a broader effort to modernise UK financial infrastructure. The pilot is separate from a retail digital pound but is linked to the same policy question: how central bank money should function in markets where assets, deposits, and payment rails are becoming increasingly digital. Settlement using central bank money could reduce counterparty risk in tokenised markets and support institutional adoption if the framework is clear.
For banks, asset managers, payment firms, and crypto companies, the UK’s direction remains cautiously constructive. The Bank is not abandoning digital money research, but it is also not moving toward a rushed CBDC launch. That measured approach may help limit political backlash while keeping the UK involved in tokenisation and next‑generation settlement experiments.
The Farage episode underscores that CBDC policy is no longer purely a technical matter; it has become a political test of trust in financial institutions. Bailey’s denial is therefore less about a single meeting and more about protecting the Bank’s ability to make digital money policy without appearing exposed to outside pressure.
Current status: The Bank of England continues to research a digital pound, with no decision on issuance. The Bank is also conducting pilot projects on tokenised asset settlement. Political developments, such as Farage’s resignation and the ongoing investigation into his gifts, remain unresolved but are unlikely to alter the Bank’s independent research trajectory. The Bank’s next steps will involve further analysis, public consultation, and potential regulatory adjustments before any final decision on a digital pound is announced.
Farage has long been a vocal critic of CBDCs in the UK, arguing that a digital pound could facilitate financial surveillance and erode personal freedom. He has even stated that he would prefer imprisonment to living under such a system. The controversy intensified after reports surfaced that Farage accepted substantial gifts from individuals linked to the crypto industry, including a £5 million donation from a crypto billionaire. In July 2026, Farage resigned his parliamentary seat amid an investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards over undeclared gifts, yet he has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that he has not broken the law.
The Bank’s statement is significant because CBDC policy sits at the intersection of monetary infrastructure, privacy, payment innovation, and political trust. If the public perceives that central bank decisions are swayed by political pressure or crypto lobbying, confidence in the review process could erode before a final decision is made. By underscoring its independence, the Bank aims to protect the credibility of its CBDC review and keep the digital pound on a technical and policy footing rather than a political one.
At present, the Bank of England is still researching a potential digital pound. No decision has been taken on whether to introduce the currency, and the project remains in the design phase. A recent update from the Bank noted that any launch would require further analysis and public consultation, allowing policymakers time to address concerns about privacy, access, commercial bank deposits, financial stability, and the role of central bank money in retail payments.
In parallel with the digital pound research, the Bank has been testing how tokenised assets could be settled using central bank money. Earlier this year, it launched a six‑month pilot involving 18 companies as part of a broader effort to modernise UK financial infrastructure. The pilot is separate from a retail digital pound but is linked to the same policy question: how central bank money should function in markets where assets, deposits, and payment rails are becoming increasingly digital. Settlement using central bank money could reduce counterparty risk in tokenised markets and support institutional adoption if the framework is clear.
For banks, asset managers, payment firms, and crypto companies, the UK’s direction remains cautiously constructive. The Bank is not abandoning digital money research, but it is also not moving toward a rushed CBDC launch. That measured approach may help limit political backlash while keeping the UK involved in tokenisation and next‑generation settlement experiments.
The Farage episode underscores that CBDC policy is no longer purely a technical matter; it has become a political test of trust in financial institutions. Bailey’s denial is therefore less about a single meeting and more about protecting the Bank’s ability to make digital money policy without appearing exposed to outside pressure.
Current status: The Bank of England continues to research a digital pound, with no decision on issuance. The Bank is also conducting pilot projects on tokenised asset settlement. Political developments, such as Farage’s resignation and the ongoing investigation into his gifts, remain unresolved but are unlikely to alter the Bank’s independent research trajectory. The Bank’s next steps will involve further analysis, public consultation, and potential regulatory adjustments before any final decision on a digital pound is announced.
